The narrator presents the boys as being inexperienced and childish in order to put emphasis on their obliviousness Essay Example

The narrator presents the boys as being inexperienced and childish in order to put emphasis on their obliviousness Essay Example The narrator presents the boys as being inexperienced and childish in order to put emphasis on their obliviousness Essay The narrator presents the boys as being inexperienced and childish in order to put emphasis on their obliviousness Essay Hes done it before, with the murders committed by Mr. Gort, for instance, and the building of the transcontinental railway, or the underground passage between our two houses. The narrator uses bombastic language in order to accentuate their innocence and naivety. This is evident of their foolhardiness, as the two boys are constantly partaking in their own childhood adventures without contemplating the possible ramifications. It is blatantly exaggerated and puts emphasis on Keiths manipulative and domineering nature, as Stephen seems to play along with him. Moreover, these are antecedent events which further accentuate their obliviousness, as they are unaware of what they are up against. Therefore, the narrator presents them as such in order to emphasise the fact that they are out of their depth. The narrator presents Stephen as misled in order to emphasise his obliviousness. I understand now that it will involve frightening difficulties and wrenching conflicts of loyalty. I have a profound intimation of the solemnity and sadness of things. The narrator uses war connotations, such as wrenching conflicts of loyalty, in order to put emphasis on the gravity of their situation. This is a microcosm, in which Keith and Stephens world is perceived as being a war or conflict of some sort and acts as an embodiment of the Second World War, in which it is a sinister world of lies and espionage, as in the Second World War, many people changed sides. Furthermore, frightening difficulties can be seen as an allusion to the Second World War, as the many forces were to face a whole variety of hindering difficulties. In addition to this, wrenching conflicts of loyalty is a cataphoric reference as Stephen finds himself in a troublesome predicament at one point or another: saving Keith from a caning or withholding information to protect Mrs. Hayward. Furthermore, sibilance is used in solemnity and sadness, in order to emphasise the sombreness of their new adventure, with Stephen unaware of what is really going on. This is, in effect, a met anarrative, which puts emphasis on the various effects of espionage, as Keith and Stephens spywork acts as a minor representation of espionage as a whole in society. Therefore, Stephens gullibility is presented in order to foretell his ultimate exposure to the actual realities. The narrator presents Keiths family as chaotic so as to put emphasis on his misinterpretations regarding the Haywards. His family have taken on the heroic proportions of characters in a legend noble father and traitorous mother playing out the never-ending conflict between good and evil, between light and dark. Dramatic irony is used, as we know that Mrs. Hayward is not a traitor at all, yet at the same time is having an affair with Aunt Dees husband, Uncle Peter. This emphasises the sexual awakening and maturing of Stephen, as he has not been exposed to such things thus far. Furthermore, oxymorons are used, good and evil, between light and dark, which is ironic, as Ted is a sadistic, abusive husband and father whilst Mrs. Hayward is a victimised wife, someone who has engaged in an affair with her sisters husband due to the abusiveness of her own spouse. Stephen is not aware of these happenings until later on, and so it accentuates their respective facades, as Ted is a former war hero yet at the same time is a manic husband who abuses his wife and canes his son regularly, whilst Mrs. Hayward is a reserved wife and mother who is pleasant and described as being very attractive. Moreover, His family have taken on the heroic proportions of characters in a legend is both ironic and a hyperbole. It is ironic as Ted Hayward is a sadistic man who abuses his family, and because we later discover that Mrs. Hayward has entered an illicit affair with her sisters husband. It is also a hyperbole as it seems highly unlikely that commonplace people could attain the somewhat abnormal traits of characters from folklore. Therefore, Keiths family is depicted as being immersed in secrecy and as being vague in order to conceal their intentions. Stephen is presented as inarticulate so as to emphasise his insecurities. I find it very difficult now to reconstruct what Im feeling its so large and complex. Perhaps the largeness of the feelings is the most noticeable thing about them. A paradox is used so as to put emphasis on the genuinely sad tinge of the writing, as Stephens low self-esteem is pathetic and it reveals that Stephen might not be a remotely interesting person, which accentuates how insecure Stephen is. Furthermore, largeness is italicised in order to put emphasis on Stephens numerous emotions. Moreover, one can infer that Keith is a foil used to oppose Stephens strong values and so this accentuates his vulnerabilities. Due to Keith, he finds it hard to express himself. Therefore, Stephen is presented as being unable to express himself in order to emphasise Keiths hold over him.